Head 10. Towards a unified theory of UFOs

I extend my hand, to point to the sky, — I think, some of the powers that be ready to put handcuffs on me — overbearing power, inclined to put all such thoughts to prison with walls of dogma. It binds a broad idea of ​​chains of any of the formulas

Goy, Charles Fort

Collecting and analyzing the facts and phenomena of UFO, logically, researchers to date (considering, that carefully studied the UFO phenomenon since the late 1940s) would have to put them into a unified theory, a, which would bring together a coherent line of all recorded and logged manifestation of the "UFO phenomenon". But in practice very difficult to make such, because a lot is, that captures UFOlogy - beyond our understanding, in other words - "nonsense" from a scientific point of view. Our (terrestrial) knowledge base is not valid to describe and explain what is happening within their terms. And, accordingly,, need a new, Though not quite a standard approach to solving this puzzle.

But, ufologists have long abandoned the standard of thinking (do not justify themselves and explain the natural sciences — natural phenomena and man-made traces of human activity), but this idea was not successful. After all, think outside the box - "means, avoid anything ". This has resulted in about fifty of hypotheses and assumptions about the nature of UFOs, of harmless (let us say, interference of light) to ugly (the tricks of Satan, how it is interpreted in the framework of the Orthodox faith). Each of these hypotheses has its followers, argue that their assumptions such as non-standard assumptions and arguments, As the hypothesis itself. Moreover, even many self-respecting scholars to admit or do not notice, that "promote", so to speak, "Unit", "Highly specialized" hypothesis, explains only a certain number of events recorded from the whole of the same series. Meanwhile, UFO epic success in creating a common unified theory of UFOs, that would cover all latched UFO phenomena as a single phenomenon.

One of these general theories may be "information". According to this view, elusive UFO phenomenon is not the real power, and the phenomenon of information, which, highly developed extraterrestrial life on Earth delivers the information to specific needs. Respectively, hypothesis of interstellar communication is legitimate, but we are wrong to interpret it in a variety of reasons.

It is interesting to mention the right sayings: "New - it is long forgotten old", because the idea was formulated, perhaps, More well-known chronicler of the unknown Fort Charles Goy (1874-1932), who wrote: "If we are talking about alien beings, technologies which are far superior to our, they could easily project images of themselves to the earth ... ". Later (the beginning of the 1990s) paleovizitologii within this topic developed and promoted by Johannes Fibah in the so-called "Theory of mimicry". In some works he has shown excellent, that such phenomena, as for example, "Phenomenon of the Virgin Mary", foreign, extraterrestrial intelligence adapts to us: to our perception, to our notions of reality and our fantasy.

An interesting fact, that in the novel "Falling Up" (1964 year), Ukrainian little known science fiction writer Alexander Polishchuk Lazarevic (1923—1979) described many cases of encounters with "flying saucers" and conjectured, that UFOs - "informative charge" of extraterrestrial intelligence, posted to stimulate technological progress of mankind.

If we consider the alleged alien visits to Earth in their classical version (where humanoid aliens arrive on Earth with the help of the ship-uterine, based elsewhere in the solar system, and with the help of the "UFO" explore the Earth for many millennia), then the actual behavior of, and, in general, Numerous features of the "UFO phenomenon" does not fit into the framework of common sense.

Perhaps, who first drew attention to this, was a French ufologist Jacques Vallee[1]. Everyone knows its "five arguments against the extraterrestrial hypothesis of UFO":