Head 9. About Cats, dogs and transformers

Knowledge of all hidden for a man just because, that man is not willing to accept them. A certain degree of willingness to open its corresponding Knowledge

Dmitry Romanchuk

Famous Russian physical chemist VI Gol'danskii used to say: "Every hypothesis has a right to exist, If we are able to evaluate it with facts and figures ".

Although, that over the years, UFOlogy, as always claims a scientific direction, gained considerable baggage of facts about the existence of the phenomenon, in matters of language attitudes, Abstracts, hypotheses and theories - here there is a complete stagnation.

All, or, at least, significant part of the, that today, the researchers adopted a working hypothesis, was formulated, curiously enough, before the birth of "UFO phenomenon" in the public consciousness (As I wrote, it happened in the late 1940s). Get to work HoTs Charles Goy Fort, published in the late XIX — the beginning of XX century (USA). Breadth of thought of this author are the envy of any modern UFO researcher with many years of research experience.

Why in the identification of "true UFO", those objects, which failed to identify, in spite of all our competence, we, as the saying goes, have not moved "one iota"? Why replace the old beliefs and hypotheses, would be neither time, no experience, did not come to new and alternative? Why replace the "not approved" hypotheses come to a blind faith and dogmatism,? And the prospects for UFO run into is not quite healthy, "a vague explanation of the unknown ..." These questions will sooner or later begin to seem no less interesting for the UFO researchers, I kak "UFO phenomenon".

But in fairness, it should be noted, that things are just things are not the best way for us. Based on the knowledge, I have received for more than 20 years of research experience in ufology, I can safely say, that the "UFO phenomenon" by its very nature - not, What we see, otherwise, that only expect to see! Baggage of our knowledge is not enough to understand things, that we face, we only associate with the things and events are already familiar to us, while often forgetting, that any analogy between conventional.

What is your cat thinking about electricity? Or how your dog relates to television? That is, we all think and assume, because of their knowledge. And when there is no knowledge, but there is a phenomenon? The cat sees the light in the apartment, and the dog responds happily to advertise your favorite food on the TV screen: existence of a phenomenon they can not deny, but what is it? It is unlikely that they know the concept of electronic and radio, they possessed such knowledge, we, perhaps, and tried to explain to them the principle of operation of these things.

So, we are exactly in the same position, as well as our pets. We see "the light in the apartment" and "advertising on television," and call these things are familiar to our hearing and vision terms and concepts, and completely unaware of the real nature of these things. The purpose of the transformer station a little bit different, than just a buzz, as it seems the birds living in the district, every day, making sure, that the devil is still buzzing hrenovina, as before.

It is obvious, that under such circumstances, knowledge of the UFO phenomenon at this stage it is impossible in principle. To know the laws, simulate and synthesize the knowledge of the phenomenon is possible by means of philosophical, venturing only a "theory of knowledge"[1].

I am in no way call to blindly believe my conclusions. On the contrary, encourage in every possible way of thinking, study, explore and learn how to research ..., and pseudo-scientific methods, what you want, only to disclose the possible nature of what is happening, stimulating the search for truth, to touch is still very far.

And in this way, researchers should be honest, firstly, in relation to themselves. Emancipate the mind to understand, perhaps, something more, what is so sure, — Perhaps it, What researchers need to arm with a first.